Well. Fixed my static route from table x (not clear why exactly I’ve used such variant being highly confused by def gateway missing) to just regular static route
vyos@crux# sh protocols
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 { next-hop 192.168.10.1 { } } }
So it works ok now, not my case, thank you.
Frankly, not clear why gateway-address such a bad idea even if it is just a wrapper for a “static route” setting. As for me it was much easier to check it out, and it comes over even from juniper os, not only vyatta…
That script, does it work for old version config conversions?