I’ve been interested in this for a while, too. However, for our needs as a service provider, we’re preparing to implement Kea as a standalone service, and taking advantage of the database back-end option. Either way, I think there are real advantages of adopting Kea over the legacy ISC DHCP.
Hello @eronlloyd, for ISP I prefer to use IPoE service. With service, IPoE your router can serv sessions started as DHCP or unclassified packet, get auth info from RADIUS, and store accountin, etc.
Hi @Dmitry. Yes, technically we implement our CPE provisioning using IPoE already. We are a GPON-based FTTX service provider, and the ONT/ONU is just a bridge assigned to a VLAN where the DHCP service is listening for broadcasts.
One of the big advantages of Kea is their hooks libraries, which we plan to use to further automate the provisioning process. This level of customization I wouldn’t want to run on a VyOS instance, in general. At least not for our types of requirements.