I’m using VyOS 1.4 and I was not able to use multiple local/remote prefixes per tunnel. Could you input a configuration example for information please?
Yes you are right, I can do like that. By the way, I have now a new issue: I can’t ping the remote networks. How must I set the static routes please?
I have 2 interfaces:
eth0 OUTSIDE
eth1 INSIDE
When I traceroute my remote local network, traffic go through ISP normal outside route and not through my tunnel route.
Thanks
OK I found the problem: when I run
set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 1… tunnel 0 remote prefix ‘22…/xx’
set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 1… tunnel 0 remote prefix ‘33…/xx’
In result, VyOS only keep the last command:
set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 1… tunnel 0 remote prefix ‘33…/xx’
I cannot have multiple remote prefix in same tunnel.
Hi,
OK I was able to update to the latest rolling and effectively I can add multiple remote prefixes.
Nevertheless, I can’t reach my remote subnets.
I tried with and without routes, same results.
Configuration seems good, and you have shared config from your “local” router. @Viacheslav is asking for your remote router configuration, so we can see if configuration on peer has defined same prefixes
Nice that 1.4 can have multiple prefixes per tunnel. But can Palo Alto do that? And can they co-operate?
For ages, I created multiple tunnels per peer, I’d just play safe and use this old method.
Through VTI, multiple prefixes per tunnel works with Palo Alto but not through ETHx in my case.
You say you use multiple tunnels per peer. Can you show an example of that vpn conf please?
The multiple tunnel per peer config already is in your 1st post. Note this will also create 3 SAs.
(Actually, 6 , as send and receive are different SAs)
Afaik, VTI is bordercase of policy based tunnel, having local and remote subnet of 0.0.0.0/0.