I’ve got two upstream connections:
- fiber connection that uses pppoe
- cellular modem and router, that is serving an internet connection to my vyos router from 172.16.5.1
I’m trying to setup default routes for both interfaces (also have wan-load-balancing setup, but I don’t think that’s related to the issue at hand):
set protocols static route 0.0.0.0/0 dhcp-interface pppoe0 set protocols static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.16.5.1 distance 100
However, no route appears to be setup for the
$ show interfaces Codes: S - State, L - Link, u - Up, D - Down, A - Admin Down Interface IP Address S/L Description --------- ---------- --- ----------- eth0 - u/u CenturyLink WAN (Managed by Ansible) eth0.201 - u/u CenturyLink PPPOE (Managed by Ansible) eth2 172.16.5.2/24 u/u Cellular WAN (Managed by Ansible) pppoe0 10.100.1.101/32 u/u
$ show ip route Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP, T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP, F - PBR, f - OpenFabric, > - selected route, * - FIB route, q - queued route, r - rejected route S>* 0.0.0.0/0 [100/0] via 172.16.5.1, eth2, 00:26:21 C>* 10.100.1.1/32 is directly connected, pppoe0, 00:26:00
$ netstat -rd Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface default 172.16.5.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2 10.100.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 pppoe0
I would expect a default route to be created via
10.100.1.1, much like the default route created via
172.16.5.1, however it doesn’t get created. I’ve tested this in a vm with a more typical
ethernet interface, and the route does get created with a dhcp address.
I’ve removed irrelevant interfaces from the above output. I’m using this ansible playbook to configure it, so you can see all the commands that are being run if needed.